Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)

From: anonymous <p37sitdu_AT_lavabit.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:52:37 +0400

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:34:46PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> Maybe it can be adopted for dwm so we would be able to remove this
> CLEANMASK macro.

Patch is attached. Maybe I missed something because I don't understand
what numlockmask is for. Maybe my patch breaks something or maybe we
can remove all numlockmask stuff?
Received on Mon Aug 01 2011 - 13:52:37 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"
Previous message: anonymous: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"
In reply to: anonymous: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"
Next in thread: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"
Reply: Ethan Grammatikidis: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"
Reply: anonymous: "Re: [dev] [st] shift-insert patch (more general: key.mask and state)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 01 2011 - 14:00:06 CEST