So I guess that means no auto-tuned Richard Stallman huh?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Paul Weber <
singpolyma_AT_singpolyma.net> wrote:
> Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote:
>
>> From: Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com>
>>
>>> only an idiot compares a software license to slavery.
>>>
>> As far as the cc-nd license RMS apparently prefers for his own audio, I
>> fully agree this is hypocritical and wrong.
>>
>
> Not to wade into a flametroll war, but for the record (in case there are
> people who actually don't know) RMS believes in ND licenses for speech so
> that he has a legal tool against people who take such speech out of context
> or misquote it in other ways.
>
> --
> Stephen Paul Weber, _AT_singpolyma
> See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
> edition right joseph
>
Received on Mon Oct 24 2011 - 16:47:29 CEST