I don't think anyone here actually feels that the monolith that most configure
scripts become is a good thing. However, that's not within the scope of what's
going on here - the idea being that ./configure is a necessary part of compiling
a sizable portion of software. Saying that we need a 'universal package
management' solution is absurd when we already have one.
Received on Thu Oct 27 2011 - 16:54:52 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Oct 27 2011 - 17:00:06 CEST