On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bryan Bennett <bbenne10_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think anyone here actually feels that the monolith that most configure
> scripts become is a good thing. However, that's not within the scope of what's
> going on here - the idea being that ./configure is a necessary part of compiling
> a sizable portion of software. Saying that we need a 'universal package
> management' solution is absurd when we already have one.
now it sounds like you're saying autoconf is a universal package
system, which is just as stupid as the original video
--
# Kurt H Maier
Received on Thu Oct 27 2011 - 17:08:16 CEST