Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:45:31 +0100

Greetings.

Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 30/10/2011, Martin Kopta <martin_AT_kopta.eu> wrote:
>> 2) Does that mean dwm won't gain any more features?
>
> There aren't really that many features that we could really add to
> dwm. The only two I really want are better support for window manager
> hints, and improving the distinction between floating and tiled
> windows.
>
>> 4) Should be the code made smaller by witty constructions or do you
>> prefer boring and obvious constructions (which are generaly longer)?
>
> The focus is on simplicity. There have been times when we've had
> smaller but more complex code, but we tend to avoid it. Simplicity is
> the key.
>
>> 5) Will be the limit of 2 kSLOC lifted up?
>
> Probably not.
>
> And ignore Christoph, he's a troll.

Ignore cls, he's a CS student.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann
Received on Sun Oct 30 2011 - 10:45:31 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Oct 30 2011 - 10:48:03 CET