Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:49:55 +0100

I dont understand the point of documentation.

If config/compile/install/uninstall must be documented we have a problem.

The target users we expect should be smart enought to read the source in case of doubt. But comments in config.h should be clear enought to not allow users to fall in c.

On 31/10/2011, at 10:43, Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com> wrote:

> On 31 October 2011 08:38, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> The current list of unclear removal candidates is:
>>
>> * ii (Nion, are you still maintaining it?)
>
> I disagree with this on the basis that it's an interesting program. If
> need be I can maintain it.
>
> On 31 October 2011 09:34, Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
>> What documentation? A manpage should suffice
>
> A manpage is a reference material. We often need more documentation
> than reference materials, and we don't want to put everything into our
> manpages and end up with some GNU-esque monstrosity.
>
> cls
>
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 10:49:55 CET