Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:00:43 +0100

On 31 October 2011 10:43, Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com> wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 08:38, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> The current list of unclear removal candidates is:
>>
>> * ii (Nion, are you still maintaining it?)
>
> I disagree with this on the basis that it's an interesting program. If
> need be I can maintain it.

For ii it is just a question of maintenance.

> On 31 October 2011 09:34, Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
>> What documentation? A manpage should suffice
>
> A manpage is a reference material. We often need more documentation
> than reference materials, and we don't want to put everything into our
> manpages and end up with some GNU-esque monstrosity.

The current approach of having a README and a manpage is enough. If
someone needs additional info, there is the wiki.

Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 11:00:43 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 31 2011 - 11:12:03 CET