Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC
I agree with libixp and ii staying.
mkopta
On 10/31/2011 11:59 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Anselm R Garbe<garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> * skvm (who uses this? development seems dead)
>
> I use it. I installed it 1 or 2 years ago, never bothered to update it
> since it works.
> I also think libixp and ii should stay. I don't use them personally
> but I think they follow the suckless philosophy.
>
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 12:14:20 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Oct 31 2011 - 12:24:03 CET