On 31 October 2011 10:59, Aurélien Aptel <aurelien.aptel_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I also think libixp and ii should stay. I don't use them personally
> but I think they follow the suckless philosophy.
ii does, but since 2007 the originally suckless libixp has been
bloated up alongside wmii. The repository includes *broken*
autogenerated manpages, and Ruby interpreter bindings.
cls
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 12:14:03 CET