Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:07:30 +0100

Adapting the makefile to link against gtk3 shouldnt be dramatic. At some point gtk2 will be like gtk1. And having two versions of the same lib sucks.

Im not using surf actually, but i find it nice to keep it in suckless. X11 is a huge dep for dwm and this is not a reason to kill it :P

On 31/10/2011, at 20:44, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Joerg Zinke wrote:
>>
>> Am 31.10.2011 um 14:35 schrieb Peter John Hartman <peterjohnhartman_AT_gmail.com>:
>>
>>>>> * surf (seems dead, please shout if you disagree or if anyone wants to
>>>>> take this on, it doesn't make sense if it is not maintained, as
>>>>> webkitgtk carries away)
>>
>> Shout!
>>
>>>> I wouldn't mind taking maintainership of Surf, if necessary. I'm
>>>> already maintaining an off-tree fork with some changes (although not all
>>>> of those changes are "suckless", I think I have figured out some good
>>>> ways to make Surf more useful).
>>>
>>> I second Troels self-nomination. I use surf all the time.
>>
>> ACK, same here. No better alternatives.
>
> Ok surf will stay, but we need some maintainer who likes to volunteer if Gottox
> really hasn't got the time anymore.
>
> Cheers,
> Anselm
>
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 23:07:30 CET