Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:50:16 +0000

On 4 November 2011 09:40, markus schnalke <> wrote:
> Someone already pointed it out. It actually were suckless projects
> that did intentionally not care about the meaning of version numbers.

I agree. I don't even see why we don't just drop the first dot and
have dwm-60, dmenu-45.

> And about quality: Who of us mainly cares about quality? We care about
> hackable code! That's important.

I do. As always, it's about trade-offs. I try to make my software as
high a quality as possible without sacrificing too much clarity.
Besides, the ultimate hackable code is an empty file.

Received on Fri Nov 04 2011 - 11:50:16 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Nov 04 2011 - 12:00:05 CET