On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David Tweed <david.tweed_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> My view is that the plan 9 technologies are attractive if and only if
> they're used everywhere: if a pseudo-filesystem interface was
> pervasive it would avoid the "learn another new language/technology
> tricks/etc for this task" and the problems like combinining
> responsiveness with low idle CPU usage would probably be solved. In
> contrast, there's little incentive to dig into 9P, and even less into
> IXP, precisely because so little stuff uses them.
This is correct, and this is why people use plan 9. Is anyone here
running wmii on plan 9?
--
# Kurt H Maier
Received on Fri Nov 11 2011 - 13:20:24 CET