On 12/18/11, hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would approve if the existence of HTML5 meant anyone using the older
> HTML4 features got killed.
Most of the novelties of HTML5 are complementary to the elements of
HTML 2 and 4. HTML3 Plus was documentation of a bunch of bells and
whistles implemented by commercial web browsers of which every copy
should be burned, twice.
Sadly, the scripting interface defined by HTML5 is defined pretty much
the same way as the elements of HTML3 Plus were, but executable code
in documents is bound to suck anyway.
> Next I would demand communism.
>
After you've shot all writers of HTML 4, lawyers, politicians,
programmers and designers? And expect people to listen to and support
your political theories?
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 17:15:03 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Dec 18 2011 - 17:24:04 CET