On 5 February 2012 07:27, Robert Ransom <rransom.8774_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-02-04, stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de <stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>> What versions of dwm are you using?
>>
>> Patched dwm based on changeset 64eb02a74f2b (Tip from end of September
>> 2010).
>
> http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/79fe8e97dcf7 might be the fix (applied
> June 2011).
>
>> Wouldn't bother to apply the fix anyway, but thanks for replying -- I
>> couldn't remember discussing such bug on the list.
>
> I never noticed the patch on the list, but I remember hearing about
> the issue on IRC.
What does this mean? The version committed in
http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/79fe8e97dcf7 has been slightly improved
shortly afterwards to since then to
http://hg.suckless.org/dwm/rev/ac3cba181282
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Wed Feb 08 2012 - 20:08:35 CET