Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: KIMURA Masaru <hiyuh.root_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:12:33 +0900

> however in my opinion a system tray is
> not necessary and should not be added to mainline.

if you don't mind my asking, explain why?
just curious.
Received on Thu Apr 05 2012 - 10:12:33 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Hannes Blut: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"
Previous message: Hannes Blut: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"
In reply to: Hannes Blut: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"
Next in thread: Hannes Blut: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"
Reply: Hannes Blut: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"
Reply: Jeremy Jackins: "Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Apr 05 2012 - 10:24:07 CEST