> Have you tried the fmtvalid() function? It seems like there is a typo
> where it is used. Such a function would still be useful in the now ex‐
> isting seq.c.
I hadn't tested it when I sent that. I've attached a version with a tested
fmtvalid function, proper support for scientific notation, validation
of the user-inputted numbers, and corrected `seq 1.0 10` behavior.
It's almost 60 lines shorter than the one in tip.
- text/x-csrc attachment: seq.c
Received on Mon Apr 16 2012 - 19:46:50 CEST