Re: [dev] A tiny IRC connection tool

From: Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:20:14 +0100

On 16 April 2012 21:45, Benjamin R. Haskell <suckless_AT_benizi.com> wrote:
> How does it compare to the other two suckless minimalist IRC tools?

In short, ircio does less. It doesn't have any real parsing of the IRC
protocol aside from PING, and it's not designed for use as an IRC
client. It's equivalent to netcatting into the server, except you
don't have to worry about pings. Aside from that you're basically
dealing with raw IRC commands, and that's why there's a large
difference in SLOC. Bad for humans, great for bots.

cls
Received on Tue Apr 17 2012 - 00:20:14 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Apr 17 2012 - 00:24:09 CEST