Re: [dev] [ii] exposed password on process monitoring

From: Truls Becken <truls.becken_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:41:14 +0200

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 20:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:

> I think PASS is good, having it removed wouldn't really gain
> us much, nothing important in terms of loc and would have
> to replace that functionality, that the irc protocol provides
> with a delayed "/j nickserv identify ..." message.
> which one is cleaner ?

True, PASS is cleaner because of the delay necessary with the nickserv
message. Key as argument sucks quite a bit, though.

-Truls
Received on Thu Apr 19 2012 - 20:41:14 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Apr 19 2012 - 20:48:05 CEST