Re: [dev] [ii] exposed password on process monitoring
On 19 April 2012 23:51, Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com> wrote:
> In my opinion the -h flag
> should be made mandatory, with no default host.
Sorry, it's -h in sic, -s in ii (which is confusing, too.)
On 20 April 2012 00:19, Nico Golde <nico_AT_ngolde.de> wrote:
> I don't really like putting that in a file.
Well, in bash you could just 'ii -k <<< pass'.
> I'm more in favor of something simpler as the following currently:
> If if you don't want to leak your password use the environment variable and not -k then...
Why didn't I think of that? I'd rather something like $IIPASS (which
better describes its function), but other than that I totally support
this approach.
Thanks,
cls
Received on Fri Apr 20 2012 - 01:24:02 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Apr 20 2012 - 01:36:05 CEST