Well, just to note, wmii+ixp are not hosted on suckless anymore.
There is still the wmii page[0] and archives on the downloads page[1].
The new home is on google-code[2] and maybe you can find some
answers on the bugtracker[3].
There is also #wmii on oftc irc, afaik.
[0]:
http://wmii.suckless.org/
[1]:
http://dl.suckless.org/wmii/
[2]:
https://code.google.com/p/wmii/
[3]:
https://code.google.com/p/wmii/issues/list
On 21 September 2012 15:49, Sanel Zukan <sanelz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:33 PM, hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > why not a cloud service?
>
> The communication will be done between desktop components, so using
> cloud here is a bit questionable :) But thanks for proposal.
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ivan Kanakarakis
> <ivan.kanak_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > you maybe interested in unixbus
>
> This project looks quite interesting; thanks for suggestion. However,
> it heavily relies on inotify, which makes it unsuitable for BSDs,
> Solaris and other unix-es. Maybe inotify support can be made optional,
> which I will look at.
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Also, related to libixp: I noticed threading support, but can it be
> >> made to work asynchronously, e.g. to be integrated with GUI main loop?
> >
> > It would be possible, but the performance will suffer...
> > ...
> > Which libixp version are you referring to?
>
> Latest I found on suckless.org, 0.5.
>
> I'm working on light desktop environment (http://edeproject.org) which
> is powered by FLTK toolkit. Among other reasons I'm ditching DBus
> (actually making it optional) is how pthreads are not available on
> stock Minix, but as addon library that will pull tons of dependencies.
>
> The whole desktop is made asynchronous, and threading is used only on
> single place, when xmlrpc-c library is used to send bug reports (which
> is optional feature). Now you see why I'm trying to avoid threading as
> possible.
>
> FLTK provides few handy functions to monitor descriptors without
> blocking UI and I was thinking how ixp_serverloop() can be updated to
> use them. But I'm not sure about the rest of library, like are there leaks,
> dropped data, possibility to crash server with malformed content and etc.
>
> Or you have maybe different proposal?
>
> Thanks.
> Sanel
>
>
--
*Ivan c00kiemon5ter V Kanakarakis* >:3
Received on Fri Sep 21 2012 - 15:19:17 CEST