* Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com> [2012-11-26 20:30]:
>Andreas Krennmair <ak_AT_synflood.at> writes:
>
>> * pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> [2012-11-26 18:00]:
>>>On 11/26/12 17:33, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>>>>programming languages, and pretending it's 'simple' because it's broken
>>>sloccount
>>>
>>>git = 126.000 C
>>>libgit2 = 37.000
>>>mercurial = 34.000 python + 3000 in C
>>>
>>> if you say that python loc is 2x times the same done in C then we
>>> should move to libgit2 with a decent frontend that can be just few
>>> lines of code linking to libgit2 statically.
>>>
>>> 37.000 LOCs is still a lot, so.. i would like to see a mercurial
>>> implementation in C
>>
>> If you're arguing on this level, then why not switch to OpenCVS?
>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/
>>
>> Only 18,133 SLOCs of C code.
>
>Why not SCCS?
Jörg Schilling's fork of SCCS has 62,917 SLOCs.
Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 20:46:37 CET