Re: [dev] Re: [suckless] Migration to git

From: Kurt H Maier <khm-suckless_AT_intma.in>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:49:49 -0500

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:46:37PM +0100, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> * Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com> [2012-11-26 20:30]:
> >Andreas Krennmair <ak_AT_synflood.at> writes:
> >
> >> * pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> [2012-11-26 18:00]:
> >>>On 11/26/12 17:33, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> >>>>programming languages, and pretending it's 'simple' because it's broken
> >>>sloccount
> >>>
> >>>git = 126.000 C
> >>>libgit2 = 37.000
> >>>mercurial = 34.000 python + 3000 in C
> >>>
> >>> if you say that python loc is 2x times the same done in C then we
> >>> should move to libgit2 with a decent frontend that can be just few
> >>> lines of code linking to libgit2 statically.
> >>>
> >>> 37.000 LOCs is still a lot, so.. i would like to see a mercurial
> >>> implementation in C
> >>
> >> If you're arguing on this level, then why not switch to OpenCVS?
> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/
> >>
> >> Only 18,133 SLOCs of C code.
> >
> >Why not SCCS?
>
> Jörg Schilling's fork of SCCS has 62,917 SLOCs.
>
>
That's because he's an idiot.

I know you're all being funny, but I just checked, and sure enough: the
git source tree is bigger than the plan 9 kernel. It's *more* than an
operating system.
Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 20:49:49 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Nov 26 2012 - 21:00:08 CET