Re: [dev] [st] Unexpected Insert key behavior in mc

From: Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:05:42 +0100

Greetings.

On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:05:42 +0100 Martti Kühne <mysatyre_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Edgaras <devoas_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have tested it with the HEAD and works fine for me. What value of TERM do you have?, and
> >> are you sure you have installed last version of the terminfo definition?.
> >>
> > I did "git pull" before compiling today. Since I did not do install previously
> > I have tested it after doing install, thus with updated terminfo, it still does
> > not work correctly. My term is st-256color .
> >
>
> same here with st-256color.
>
> I'm half way planning to look into this once more tonight. Thanks for
> the hint with mc, I'll use that (beside bash and sandy) for reference.
> Also also take note of entries in your ~/.terminfo which will take
> precedence afaik.

I now applied your patch correctly. Because it wasn’t a proper patchfile
I had to manually apply it. This big array was an invention of k0ga. He
should get it right. I will only intervene, if some key combination I
use does not work.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann
Received on Mon Dec 10 2012 - 15:05:42 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 10 2012 - 15:24:08 CET