Re: [dev] [st] font fallback

From: Charlie Kester <corky1951_AT_comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 06:46:04 -0800

On 12/29/2012 12:20 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Initially I was worried that the newer version was somehow slower to
> the version I was running before.

Not slower, but definitely bigger. The stripped executable is now 16x
the size of that from the 0.3 release -- thanks, no doubt, to these font
caches, which are implemented as static arrays.

> Been using st as my main terminal for a few months now. :)

Me too. :)
Received on Sat Jan 05 2013 - 15:46:04 CET