Re: [dev] [st] st 0.4 slow startup

From: KarlOskar Rikås <kalle97r_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:50:50 +0200

Why not?
On Apr 7, 2013 12:21 AM, "Igor Šarić" <karabaja4_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> I just came to report a bug. I didn't say nor I think I am an expert in
> anything related to st, and if I could, I would provide the fixes and/or
> more details.
>
> I also don't judge people by what software they're using.
>
> Best of luck with st.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:23:38 +0200 Igor Šarić <karabaja4_AT_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I just tested the commit Chris posted.
>> >
>> > Yes, that commit is the cause of the startup delay:
>>
>> Thanks for not being helpful at all. Here at suckless we look at the
>> content of a commit. You can clearly see that this commit added Xft sup‐
>> port. Xft is a bugged and misdesigned system that is nearly as bugged
>> and misdesigned as the X11 core fonts and the X11 server. Please try to
>> add some straces in how many files are opened, how your fontconfig might
>> behave wrong etc. etc. I can’t help there, my fontconfig and xft are
>> fast.
>>
>> Btw., this Arch Linux mentality is annoying. You are no expert by com‐
>> menting that something is »slow« when the source is open and there for
>> you to send in patches to fix problems.
>>
>> Sorry, I’m annoyed today and you came by as an Arch user. These are the
>> perfect victims for any crime against humanity, like systemd, feminism
>> or social democracy.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Christoph Lohmann
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Sun Apr 07 2013 - 10:50:50 CEST