Re: [dev] st: Large pile of code

From: <>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:23:29 -0400

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 9:32, Carlos Torres wrote:
> I like the seperation of term.c from st.c, I agree that makes reading
> st.c clearer. I can't comment on the removal of forward declarations,
> typedefs and static vars though the resulting difference is legible as
> well. (frankly code in alphabetical order makes me want to sort it
> according to code flow and surrounding context...) i think the choice
> of using the fontconfig utf8 functions was a good idea. I frowned
> when you switched to 'gnu99' from 'c99' (i pictured a lot of flames on
> that)

If it _can_ be compiled in c99 mode, no reason it shouldn't be - then
people can compile it using LLVM/clang, tendra, pcc, etc.

How hard is it going to be to merge these changes with what changes have
been made to the main version since he branched off from it?
Received on Wed Apr 24 2013 - 16:23:29 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Apr 24 2013 - 16:36:02 CEST