Re: [dev] st: Large pile of code

From: Carlos Torres <vlaadbrain_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:42 -0400

i haven't tried rebasing his code yet. but if i have time later this
week i might try it. for fun.

--Carlos

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:23 AM, <random832_AT_fastmail.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 9:32, Carlos Torres wrote:
>> I like the seperation of term.c from st.c, I agree that makes reading
>> st.c clearer. I can't comment on the removal of forward declarations,
>> typedefs and static vars though the resulting difference is legible as
>> well. (frankly code in alphabetical order makes me want to sort it
>> according to code flow and surrounding context...) i think the choice
>> of using the fontconfig utf8 functions was a good idea. I frowned
>> when you switched to 'gnu99' from 'c99' (i pictured a lot of flames on
>> that)
>
> If it _can_ be compiled in c99 mode, no reason it shouldn't be - then
> people can compile it using LLVM/clang, tendra, pcc, etc.
>
> How hard is it going to be to merge these changes with what changes have
> been made to the main version since he branched off from it?
>
Received on Wed Apr 24 2013 - 20:52:42 CEST