Re: [dev] rio for linux

From: Sam Watkins <sam_AT_nipl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 15:24:36 +1000

> The problem is the complexity of writing a replacement and all the
> compatibility layers needed to make it usable in the productive world.

The "window to a framebuffer" thing appeals to me because it would be simple,
performant, easy to implement, easy to code for, easy to port libs and
apps to use it. I don't need partly obscured windows or enforced clipping.
Also don't need every bogus app under the sun to work on it right away.
Received on Thu May 02 2013 - 07:24:36 CEST