Re: [dev] Is there any plan on a shell for sbase?

From: Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 20:29:53 +0200

Greetings.

On Fri, 31 May 2013 20:29:53 +0200 Evan Gates <evan.gates_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > * ugly POSIX style
> > * backwards compatibility?
>
> I think it would be nice to have a simplest possible POSIX compliant sh.
> I'm not well versed in the options that already exist, is there a minimally
> compliant, smallest possible, POSIX sh?
>
> I also think it would be nice to create a new shell from the ground up, to
> see what happens...
>
> I'd love to see a shell in sbase (POSIX, rc, completely new), just to see
> what a suckless approach to creating a shell would be. (And I've been
> curious about yacc for a while.)

Just waiting for it to happen won’t solve this problem. Suckless is what
we all produce and which fits the solution. So instead of waiting, just
create it.

> P.S. Any recommendations on joining #suckless when connecting to oftc
> through tor?

Don’t be a terrorist pedophile so don’t use tor. Only feminists, pe‐
dophiles and terrorists use tor.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann
Received on Fri May 31 2013 - 20:29:53 CEST