Re: [dev] [sbase] 64-bit type for split

From: Rob <robpilling_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:29:17 +0100

Interesting mix of top- and bottom-posting. I'll not disturb it.

Anyway, 1999 was 14 years ago. I think uint64_t is the least of our
worries if we're porting to some exotic architecture where gcc can't at
least emulate a 64-bit integer. I mean even tcc has a runtime library
for that.

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 01:10:37PM -0500, Galos, David wrote:
> Right, but '-ansi -pedantic' is strictly C89. GCC doesn't complain,
> but I could imagine there being trepidation around using a C99 header
> in a C89 environment (where it is not required).
>
> 2013/6/11 Thorsten Glaser <tg_AT_mirbsd.de>:
> > Galos, David dixit:
> >
> >>On GNU systems stdint.h still provides uint64_t, but I have no idea
> >>how portable this is.
> >
> > <stdint.h> is C99.
> >
> > bye,
> > //mirabilos
> > --
> > 17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so
> > 17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig
> > 17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig; früher warst du als nerd voll am arsch
> > 17:10⎜«Vutral» heute bist du als nerd der einzige der wirklich damit klarkommt
> >
>
Received on Tue Jun 11 2013 - 22:29:17 CEST