Re: [dev] [sbase] built with watcom

From: Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:49:13 +0200

On tis 18 jun 2013 21:38:45, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jens Staal dixit:
>
>>> How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
>
>> That depends on how you define "working".
>
> Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
>
> Indeed, I see a serious problem should Debian also fall, because neither
> *buntu (for obvious reasons) nor Gentoo (for less obvious ones) are able
> to fill the “company use, but no need for sucky RHEL/SLES” niche… but it
> is still an if, and at least a GR away.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilo

I am looking at Alpine at the moment... uclibc/busybox based, Arch-like
package management and build system and openrc as init... I will
however stay on Arch until I have made a final decision...
Received on Tue Jun 18 2013 - 21:49:13 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 18 2013 - 22:00:10 CEST