Re: [dev] Re: Maintaining sbase

From: Markus Teich <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:52:45 +0200

Am 2013-06-25 16:42, schrieb Jesse Ogle:
> I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
> this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
> that?

I don't think „Everyone is doing it this way“ is a valid argument in
any discussion.

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
<> wrote:
> The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
> Sbase should not include a shell.

This however is a good argument.

Received on Tue Jun 25 2013 - 16:52:45 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 25 2013 - 17:00:06 CEST