Re: [dev] Re: Maintaining sbase

From: Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:53:19 -0400

On 25 June 2013 10:45, Chris Down <chris_AT_chrisdown.name> wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle <jesse.p.ogle_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
>> this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
>> that?
>
> GNU coreutils has no shell, it is packaged separately (as GNU bash).
>

Are we determining ourselves based upon GNU, instead of what is
logical or better?

first of all, some things in moreutils would be awesome
Received on Tue Jun 25 2013 - 16:53:19 CEST