On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:43:00PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:17:42 -0400, Carlos Torres <vlaadbrain_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I didn't know about this
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQyMTQ
> >
> > I'm both excited or looking to troll
>
> I'm the author of the port. I'm not sure how the suckless community
> feels about Wayland, but it seems like the core protocol is fairly
> lightweight, depends only on libffi, and is refreshing to work with
> compared to X. Weston's goals are perhaps more orthogonal to suckless,
> but I think there is potential for a suckless compositor.
I'd rather use dwm + wayland than dwm + xorg.
Received on Mon Jul 29 2013 - 08:15:59 CEST