Re: [dev] [stali] Status

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:06:54 +0300

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:05:30PM +0300, sin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:26:12PM +0300, FRIGN wrote:
> > Am 8/29/13 9:15 PM, schrieb Anselm R Garbe:
> > >On 29 August 2013 16:37, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> > >>Am 8/29/13 4:58 PM, schrieb Andrew Mikhnevich:
> > >>
> > >>>I'm intresting in stali so.
> > >>>In the conference(http://suckless.org/conference) was the performance of
> > >>>this.
> > >>>Presentation here http://suckless.org/slcon13.pdf
> > >>>
> > >>>But no http://git.sta.li/ or is it still private.
> > >>>
> > >>>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:27 PM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Hello,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>as a follower of the suckless-projects, I was wondering how stali is
> > >>>>progressing.
> > >>>>There hasn't been news for almost three years now and I hope the project
> > >>>>hasn't been put on ice.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>What is the current status?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> FRIGN
> > >>
> > >>Thanks for pointing to the pdf-file, Andrew. I seem to have missed it while
> > >>going through the slcon-page.
> > >>Reading the slides however, I still wonder what happened to
> > >>http://git.sta.li announced to be launched that night.
> > >
> > >Sorry, the cgit contained an error. This is fixed now.
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >Anselm
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Alright, thanks for taking care of this!
> >
> > A little note concerning sta.li: If we're planning to use runit as
> > an init-system, it would be nice to have it hosted on git.sta.li.
> > The core-software hasn't been committed to in four years and is in
> > bad need for a restructure.
> >
> > Also, it surely would be great if we had the proposed
> > stali-init-scripts by Christoph Lohmann available at this central
> > location.
> >
> > These are just some raw ideas, but I'm sure development will kick
> > off very well once there's some _transparent_ activity.
> >
> > What do you all think?
>
> I also hope that sbase and ubase can be part of sta.li instead of
> busybox.
> There is however, a lot of work involved to make this work nicely.
> The stali-init-scripts use nldev + mdev, I'd also like to replace
> mdev with smdev[1].
> I think sta.li development is currently very much decentralized.

[1] http://git.2f30.org/smdev/

Very much unfinished at the moment.
Received on Thu Aug 29 2013 - 21:06:54 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 29 2013 - 21:12:10 CEST