Am 8/29/13 10:06 PM, schrieb sin:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:05:30PM +0300, sin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:26:12PM +0300, FRIGN wrote:
>>> Am 8/29/13 9:15 PM, schrieb Anselm R Garbe:
>>>> On 29 August 2013 16:37, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 8/29/13 4:58 PM, schrieb Andrew Mikhnevich:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm intresting in stali so.
>>>>>> In the conference(http://suckless.org/conference) was the performance of
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>> Presentation here http://suckless.org/slcon13.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But no http://git.sta.li/ or is it still private.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:27 PM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as a follower of the suckless-projects, I was wondering how stali is
>>>>>>> progressing.
>>>>>>> There hasn't been news for almost three years now and I hope the project
>>>>>>> hasn't been put on ice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the current status?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FRIGN
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for pointing to the pdf-file, Andrew. I seem to have missed it while
>>>>> going through the slcon-page.
>>>>> Reading the slides however, I still wonder what happened to
>>>>> http://git.sta.li announced to be launched that night.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, the cgit contained an error. This is fixed now.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Anselm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alright, thanks for taking care of this!
>>>
>>> A little note concerning sta.li: If we're planning to use runit as
>>> an init-system, it would be nice to have it hosted on git.sta.li.
>>> The core-software hasn't been committed to in four years and is in
>>> bad need for a restructure.
>>>
>>> Also, it surely would be great if we had the proposed
>>> stali-init-scripts by Christoph Lohmann available at this central
>>> location.
>>>
>>> These are just some raw ideas, but I'm sure development will kick
>>> off very well once there's some _transparent_ activity.
>>>
>>> What do you all think?
>>
>> I also hope that sbase and ubase can be part of sta.li instead of
>> busybox.
>> There is however, a lot of work involved to make this work nicely.
>> The stali-init-scripts use nldev + mdev, I'd also like to replace
>> mdev with smdev[1].
>> I think sta.li development is currently very much decentralized.
>
> [1] http://git.2f30.org/smdev/
>
> Very much unfinished at the moment.
>
>
Unfinished, but a great start!
How do you like the idea we compile a list of repositories and then
think about merging them into one (e.g., git.sta.li)?
Currently, we compiled two external repos, but I'm sure there are more:
http://git.r-36.net/stali-init/ : stali init-files
http://git.2f30.org/smdev/ : smdev as a replacement for mdev
(...)
Feel free to share more of them for a better overview!
cheers
FRIGN
Received on Thu Aug 29 2013 - 21:28:26 CEST