look for instance photoshop 2, 20 years ago:
simple and efficient
http://netdna.webdesignerdepot.com/uploads/evolution_of_photoshop/107-mac2.jpg
2013/12/2 Alexander Huemer <alexander.huemer_AT_xx.vu>:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:54:11PM +0100, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
>> Since a long time I have been using gimp on Windows and Linux.
>>
>> Gimp on Linux is rather ok, but on Linux, the portable version and the
>> 2.8.10 are very slow, which limits drastically the use.
>
> A photo editor is a combination of a lot of components, and it's a GUI
> program. I don't see a proper way to do that as a whole in a suckless
> fashion, for my personal definition of suckless.
> The only thing I can think of is a suckless variant of an imagemagick
> like tool.
>
> Kind regards,
> -Alex
>
Received on Mon Dec 02 2013 - 18:07:58 CET
