Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Support for _NET_WM_PID

From: Eric Pruitt <eric.pruitt_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:12:52 -0600

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 07:42:06AM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> pid is a variable for the pid of the slave process, so I think it
> is a bit confusing using it for the pid of the master process, and
> if the order of the initialization is changed we will lost the slave
> pid. I think could be better to use a local variable.

I've attached a version of the patch that uses a local variable instead.

Eric

Received on Wed Dec 11 2013 - 14:12:52 CET