Re: [dev] [wiki] Add suckless init

From: patrick295767 patrick295767 <>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:13:37 +0100


This is definitely correct, - more than correct:
     "The busybox init code is far from pretty."

I would not add it. Furthermore, it is a pretty slow application.

On the other hand: Another application:
   Although the dependencies, I like the code of this application. I
believe it is sort of minimal (well, ... except the poppler..)
   This dependency is the only problem.


2013/12/12 Bryan Bennett <>:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, sin <> wrote:
>> The busybox init code is far from pretty. I have not personally looked
>> at ignite so I don't know.
> I'm personally using minirc[1] on a number of boxes (which makes use of
> busybox's init and busybox's mdev, or some implementation of udev, of
> which I've picked eudev over systemd's). You guys might like it. It's
> POSIX shell with some interesting choices.
>> David Galos wrote a small init which you might be interested in.
>> Check it out at:
> This looks really interesting. I might try it out this weekend. Thanks for the
> link
> [1]:
Received on Thu Dec 12 2013 - 15:13:37 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Dec 12 2013 - 15:24:09 CET