Re: [dev] [wiki] Add suckless init

From: YpN <>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:11:07 +0100

Hiltjo Posthuma <> wrote:
> I've been using runit-musl with the ignite scripts and it works really
> well. I still need to replace udev with busybox mdev or smdev.
> Links:
> runit:
> ignite:
> conference talk about runit and ignite:

Yes, runit + ignite seems to be wonderful. I didn't have enough time but
I'll test them soon.

> Reading through the mails and having been knowing runit for quite a while now, I think it is a great suckless component we could use for stali, especially in regard to the already available scripts to use.
> However, maybe forking it and optimizing things here and there may be a cool idea, given the project doesn't appear to be maintained by the developer anymore.
> What do you think?

I'm not involved in suckless projects, but I like this idea. I would love
to see an init, maintained by suckless team.

Kind regards
From Y.
Received on Sat Dec 14 2013 - 14:11:07 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Dec 14 2013 - 14:12:06 CET