Re: [dev] [9base] bionic port

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:52:52 +0100

On 20 December 2013 10:40, FRIGN <> wrote:
> Greetings fellow hackers,
> I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic
> was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries
> like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact
> bionic is mainly targeted at ARM (for instance, FORTIFY_SOURCE only
> works on this arch and with GCC only).
> Could it be that bionic has been chosen as the lowest common
> denominator to still be able to use it as one standard library also in
> regard to C++ on
> Please let me know so I can start with the work!

musl is the way to go.

Received on Fri Dec 20 2013 - 12:52:52 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 20 2013 - 13:00:19 CET