Re: [dev] [9base] bionic port

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:06:03 +0000

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:05:00AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:51:20 +0000
> sin <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I'd go with musl. What is your plan at the moment?
> >
>
> I planned on going for musl, too. It seems to be the best option,
> especially because we're planning to link stuff statically anyway.
> Thus, there's no need to look out for a standard library which also
> supports C++.
> To avoid confusion in the future, we should think about updating the
> wiki accordingly.

Are you planning on porting 9base only for the moment or are you thinking
of doing general sta.li work? A build system for sta.li would be awesome
to have.
Received on Fri Dec 20 2013 - 13:06:03 CET