Re: [dev] [PATCH][RFC] Add a basic version of tr

From: Silvan Jegen <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:37:46 +0100

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
<k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
>> I would still go for the function-pointer-less version of the
>> code since it actually is one line shorter, I think. The second,
>> function-pointer-less version of the code can be found below.
>
> I like more the version with the pointer function because you
> only have a copy of the loop and because the text segment of
> the executable will be smaller.

I don't mind either way.

Does anyone else have any strong feelings one way or the other?
Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 11:37:46 CET