Re: [dev] [PATCH][RFC] Add a basic version of tr

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:46:41 +0000

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
> >> I would still go for the function-pointer-less version of the
> >> code since it actually is one line shorter, I think. The second,
> >> function-pointer-less version of the code can be found below.
> >
> > I like more the version with the pointer function because you
> > only have a copy of the loop and because the text segment of
> > the executable will be smaller.
>
> I don't mind either way.
>
> Does anyone else have any strong feelings one way or the other?

I also prefer the function pointer based version.
Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 11:46:41 CET