On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marc André Tanner <mat_AT_brain-dump.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:17:54 +0100 Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > is there any less sucking screen/tmux replacement these days?
>> >
>> > I just tried to find one, but no luck...
>>
>> Dtach and dvtm are separate features and both can replace tmux and
>> screen. A rewrite of tmux is just wasting resources.
>
> Actually just a couple of days ago I uploaded a dtach replacement
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/abduco.git
>
> it is so far only lightly tested but I hope that in combination with
> dvtm this will serve as a cleaner, simpler, more robust and generally
> suckless alternative to tmux/screen.
>
> Comments welcome.
Question:
Can you explain why you coded it? What in dtach(1) didn't you like?
Comment:
The manpage states
> if a given session name starts either with a dot or a forward slash
> it is interpreted as a path name and used unmodified i.e. relatively to the
> current working directory.
That seems a bit surprising. Either the wording and the functionality
differ or the functionality is very surprising. I'd expect
> if a given session name starts with a forward slash
> it is interpreted as an absolute path, if a dot followed
> by a slash (./) it is interpreted a relative path.
Cheers,
--
______________
Raphaël Proust
Received on Sun Feb 23 2014 - 12:58:36 CET