-- Hugues On 04/02/14 15:56, Nick wrote: > That is a good idea, but I think we should probably be bolder. > > /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink> > /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SSELP</b></u></blink> > /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SURF</b></u></blink> > /usr/bin/<blink><u><b>DWM</b></u></blink> > > Of course we'd have to patch <blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink> to > parse XHTML, but frankly it's embarassing we haven't done that yet. > > Quoth FRIGN: >> Well, I don't think this emphasizes the SUCKLESS® corporate-identity as much as it should. >> I propose we include underscores, too: >> >> /usr/bin/_ST_ >> /usr/bin/_SSELP_ >> /usr/bin/_SURF_ >> /usr/bin/_DWM_ >> >> Cheers >> >> FRIGN >> >> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:31:21 +0200 >> stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: >>> Thanks for bringing up that very important issue, I was annoyed too. >>> >>> Here is something else that bugs me a lot: >>> PLEASE SPELL DWM HOW IT OUGHT BE DONE: IN CAPITALS. >>> >>> I suggest other suckless projects to do so either. And I would go so far >>> to capitalize the executables, too. Though, that might be too radical. >>> I'd like to hear how people feel about it. >>> >>> Look at that: >>> >>> /usr/bin/ST >>> /usr/bin/SSELP >>> /usr/bin/SURF >>> /usr/bin/DWM >>> >>> Don't they look much more appealing to you. Admit it! It's only habit if >>> you are not immediately euphoric about this idea! >>> >>> Think positive, be creative, innovate, top post! >>> >>> * Raphaël Proust 2014-04-02 12:16 >>>> Can you please include the whole message you are replying to in your >>>> answers guys? It's very difficult to follow this thread if I have to >>>> go back and read the previous messages and it is a very important >>>> thread for the suckless group. Making good software is nice but don't >>>> forget to make good communications too. >>>> >>>> By the way, can the person in charge of >>>> https://www.facebook.com/pages/dwm/103482239693985 be a bit more >>>> active? I keep telling people to try dwm (which needs to be rewritten >>>> in ruby) but once they see the facebook page they say it looks dead >>>> and bad. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:11:34 +0200 >>>>> Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is great news. Now that suckless has reached the future we will see >>>>>> a bright horizont of pleasure and commercial support. >>>>> Most definitely! >>>>> However, we need to build up your corporate identity. I suggest we make >>>>> suckless a registered trademark and sue everyone who adopts our brand >>>>> without permission. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> FRIGN >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> >>>>> >>> --s_ >>> >> >> -- >> FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> >>Received on Wed Apr 02 2014 - 16:26:04 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Apr 02 2014 - 16:36:06 CEST