Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:42:22 +0100

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return
> code is <0. Maybe something like the following?

Looks good. Can you resend with an attachment?
Received on Sat Apr 12 2014 - 21:42:22 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?"
Previous message: Troels Henriksen: "Re: [dev] [surf] link hinting"
In reply to: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?"
Next in thread: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?"
Reply: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Apr 12 2014 - 21:48:06 CEST