On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:42:22PM +0100, sin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return
> > code is <0. Maybe something like the following?
>
> Looks good. Can you resend with an attachment?
Can do!
Received on Sat Apr 12 2014 - 22:20:14 CEST