Re: [dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:31:47 +0100

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:28:50PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Given ubase was already very close to compile with c90-mode enabled,
> why not do it then?
> Basically, it involved switching to uint_least64_t instead of unsigned long long
> and improving some dynamic-array magic.

uint_least64_t is C99.
Received on Wed Jun 04 2014 - 17:31:47 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero: "Re: [dev] [PATCH] [ubase] Simplify login"
Previous message: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [PATCH] [ubase] Simplify login"
In reply to: FRIGN: "[dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90"
Next in thread: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90"
Reply: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90"
Reply: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jun 04 2014 - 17:36:22 CEST