On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:25:58PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:16:36PM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:05:20PM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>>>> > There's also smdev[0] if you are interested.
>>>> >
>>>> > [0] http://git.2f30.org/smdev
>>>>
>>>> Using a makefile is overkill. Should be a sh script.
>>>
>>> Learn how to write portable makefiles. If you don't like
>>> make use mk.
>>
>> You missed the point. read my answer to FRIGN.
>
> I ignored the point.
Indeed.
> > > FWIW smdev does not consist of a single source file. We also
> > > build util.a.
> >
> > Few source files does not mean *one* source file. Do you
> > understand that?
>
> Regardless of the number of source files you arguments are
> wrong.
My arguments are perfectly sensible from the perspective of making
SDKs suckless: the avoidance of technically expensive components
in small SDKs.
Please could you state with more that "you arguments are wrong",
why they are wrong. I'm opened minded, I'm willing to read them.
--
Sylvain
Received on Wed Jun 25 2014 - 16:40:44 CEST